The Performance Review Evolved

By Austin Baker

Love them or hate them, employee performance evaluations are here to stay. The task most HR departments nowadays are tasked with are finding methods to overhaul our review systems to make these often-mindless-and-useless meetings

  • More effective for the company
  • More effective for the employee
  • Easier

Leading a high-performing team in today’s dynamic work environment first means properly leading the team’s individual players. How? Shifting your style and your mindset from the dated conception of performance management to one that focuses on employee development. In defining this shift, you’ll see how this focus breeds highly-motivated employees and the ability to crush performance goals.

Holding onto staff by recognizing, developing and challenging them sets a modern thriving enterprise apart from one destined to stagnate and fold.

Swapping out the mindset of performance management for employee development means providing a work environment where modern employees don’t feel stuck in a repetitive rut, where they aren’t pushed beyond the boundaries of their greatest potential. This is key to developing the loyalty and engagement of your rockstar employees.

Let’s get to how to make this happen.

Feed­back will Need to Be Sup­port­ed By Reg­u­lar Coach­ing Conversations

The per­for­mance man­age­ment debate has focused heav­i­ly on the impor­tance of fre­quent, real-time feed­back. How­ev­er, the quan­ti­ty of feed­back is not a sil­ver bul­let that will mag­i­cal­ly pro­duce a work­force of engaged and pro­duc­tive employ­ees. If com­pa­nies want to achieve gen­uine per­for­mance gains, fre­quent feed­back needs to be accom­pa­nied by reg­u­lar coach­ing con­ver­sa­tions, dur­ing which the man­ag­er and employ­ee step back and reflect on the feed­back that has been giv­en, using it to dis­cov­er strengths and high­light areas for devel­op­ment.


At work, frequent coach­ing con­ver­sa­tions allow an indi­vid­ual to address and devel­op in terms of per­son­al and pro­fes­sion­al devel­op­ment. The per­for­mance man­age­ment trend towards coach­ing con­ver­sa­tions and con­tin­u­ous learn­ing has been dri­ven in part by the increas­ing recog­ni­tion of the pow­er of growth mind­set and con­tin­u­ous learn­ing.

Per­for­mance Man­age­ment Will Focus on How to Make Employ­ees and Man­agers More Effective

During performance appraisals, HR is pri­mar­i­ly con­cerned with employ­ee engage­ment — and for good rea­son. High­ly engaged employ­ees are loy­al employ­ees who will go the extra mile to get their work done. As a result, employ­ee engage­ment tech­nol­o­gy has grown sig­nif­i­cant­ly recently.

In 2019 we are seeing a new trend – the optimization of pro­duc­tiv­i­ty and per­for­mance, on both an indi­vid­ual and team basis. In oth­er words, now that we have mea­sured engage­ment, it is time to take action and improve it with the aim of mak­ing employ­ees more productive.

Accord­ing to Gallup, the biggest fac­tor in terms of employ­ee engage­ment is an employee’s man­ag­er. With this in mind, per­for­mance man­age­ment and per­for­mance man­age­ment tech­nol­o­gy will need to focus more on sup­port­ing and empow­er­ing peo­ple man­agers to be more effec­tive and enabling employ­ees to bring their best selves to work. This, com­bined with well­be­ing ini­tia­tives, will play a vital role in boost­ing employ­ee productivity.

Separating evaluations and compensation

Many companies that have moved to continuous feedback have also taken the next step and separated performance evaluation from any discussion about compensation.

The idea of disconnecting formal performance evaluations and compensation decisions feels counter-intuitive. Most companies have always linked evaluations, comparative ratings and compensation. Top performers get above average compensation and increases. Poor performers see below average pay, and most are compensated around the market average for their jobs and seniority.

The problems with this approach also cluster in the middle, however. There is always a limit to the available compensation budget. If a manager has already decided to pay one employee slightly more than his or her peer, they might be tempted to tweak ratings to justify the difference. When employees find out about the ratings difference, they are likely to be demoralized, and lose engagement with the organization over time. Over time, employees come to see things as a horse race and are more likely to undercut each other instead of working together.

Busi­ness­es will opt for con­tin­u­ous per­for­mance man­age­ment soft­ware over appraisal software

As we men­tioned ear­li­er, annu­al per­for­mance appraisals are falling out of favor and reg­u­lar one-to-one per­for­mance dis­cus­sions and feed­back are becom­ing the de-fac­to way of man­ag­ing per­for­mance. In 2017, an increas­ing num­ber of organizations approach­ing us who have tried to move infor­mal­ly to a con­tin­u­ous per­for­mance man­age­ment approach, with­out using ded­i­cat­ed soft­ware, and have failed to get traction.

The prin­ci­ples of con­tin­u­ous feed­back and reg­u­lar check-ins are sim­ple and man­agers like this approach, but new habits take time to devel­op. So hav­ing soft­ware that active­ly encour­ages these ways of man­ag­ing per­for­mance, reminds peo­ple of what they need to do and when to do it. These reports pro­vides vis­i­bil­i­ty to HR of who is and isn’t doing it is essen­tial for success.

We’ve also spo­ken to many com­pa­nies who have tried to customize their exist­ing appraisal soft­ware to sup­port a more agile, con­tin­u­ous per­for­mance man­age­ment approach and it hasn’t worked. When soft­ware is changed to do some­thing that it wasn’t orig­i­nal­ly designed to do, it ends up feel­ing ​‘clunky’ for users and becomes a bar­ri­er to good per­for­mance management. For these rea­sons, we pre­dict that there will be an accel­er­a­tion of com­pa­nies procur­ing pur­pose-built con­tin­u­ous per­for­mance man­age­ment soft­ware rather than annu­al appraisal software.

Austin Baker is the President of HRO Partners, a human resources consulting and benefit administration and enrollment firm as well as a National Enrollment Partner Member representing the largest boutique, full service insurance and enrollment firms in the country. A veteran of more than 16 years in the human resources and insurance & benefits industry, Baker is responsible for managing a multifaceted human resources consulting company with public workforce programs and services focused on companies in the southeastern United States. Austin is a frequent speaker on a variety of leadership and benefit topics representing thought leadership and innovative practices in the HR industry. For more information, call Baker at 1-866-822-0123, visit www.hro-partners.com or connect with the company at www.facebook.com/ hropartners, www.linkedin.com/in/jaustinbaker or twitter.com/jaustinbaker